PDA

View Full Version : Viking discovery spurs big bill


3dGameMan
12-05-2004, 10:10 AM
Viking discovery spurs big bill: ~source (http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article826737.ece)

A landowner in Nord-Trøndelag is regretting the day he reported finding the remains of a Viking-era pier to the authorities. That's because he's now being ordered to help cover excavation costs.
Steinar Østerlie found the remains of a 1,000-year-old pier when he started building a small boat harbour off land he owns in the coastal community of Frosta.

At first, reports local newspaper Adresseavisen, the timber Østerlie found set off great jubilation. Experts believe it was part of a ferry terminal built for high-ranking men in Viking times.

Østerlie's excitement over the discovery quickly cooled, however, when he was ordered to pay NOK 100,000 (about USD 14,000) to secure the area.

He protested the big bill and won a partial reprieve, only to be told he'd need to pay NOK 40,000 instead as the landowner's contribution towards excavation costs.

Østerlie thinks that's unfair, and will discourage others from reporting archaeological discoveries.

"With bills like this, no one is going to report finding anything historical," he fumes. "Given my own experience, I would almost advise folks to keep such discoveries to themselves."

He's launching a final appeal to Norway's state environmental agency, in an effort to get the NOK 40,000 bill withdrawn.

bejohnson
12-05-2004, 10:16 AM
I was reading about this in one of my father-in-law's papers from Norway. The land owner is correct. My father-in-law and I agree, if either of us owned property in Norway and found a historical site, we would proceed with my plans and ignore the find unless the State agreed to pay for the excavation.

If the country wants it then they pay for it.

egarrard
12-05-2004, 11:56 AM
It's a cultural and historical benefit to all people. The government should either pay for it all, or the landowner should destroy it and put his dock in over the top of it. It's his land to do with as he sees fit, within reason. A dock would seem to fall within those standards.

Where has common sense gone these days? :Sigh

Maro
12-05-2004, 03:51 PM
You'd actually bulldoze a historical site? Why not just move your plan a few metres away whils the dispute is reconciled?
:What the

egarrard
12-06-2004, 06:42 PM
You'd actually bulldoze a historical site? Yep. He didn't have to mention it to anybody. He did and got screwed. Yes, I'd bulldoze it.

Maro
12-06-2004, 07:15 PM
Surprising really - I thought you Americans would be slapping preservation orders on everything. You don't have much history :lmao

egarrard
12-06-2004, 10:19 PM
You don't have much history :lmaoMaybe that's why... :lmao :rofl2

Maro
12-06-2004, 11:53 PM
That's why you are so close to the UK - you know you can take their's whenever you want

:o