PDA

View Full Version : Sharing Doesn't Hurt Most Artists - Survey


3dGameMan
12-06-2004, 09:04 AM
Sharing Doesn't Hurt Most Artists - Survey: ~source (http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=Z5R4HBC1PYKHCCRBAE0CF FA?type=internetNews&storyID=6997352)

Sun Dec 5, 2004 04:04 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Most musicians and artists say the Internet has helped them make more money from their work despite online file-trading services that allow users to copy songs and other material for free, according to a study released on Sunday.
Recording labels and movie studios have hired phalanxes of lawyers to pursue "peer to peer" networks like Kazaa, and have sued thousands of individuals who distribute copyrighted material through such networks.

But most of the artists surveyed by the nonprofit Pew Internet and American Life Project said online file sharing did not concern them much.

Artists were split on the merits of peer-to-peer networks, with 47 percent saying that they prevent artists from earning royalties for their work and another 43 percent saying they helped promote and distribute their material.

But two-thirds of those surveyed said file sharing posed little threat to them, and less than one-third of those surveyed said file sharing was a major threat to creative industries.

Only 3 percent said the Internet hurt their ability to protect their creative works.

"What we hear from a wide spectrum of artists is that, despite the real challenges of protecting work online, the Internet has opened new ways for them to exercise their imaginations and sell their creations," said report author Mary Madden, a research specialist at the Pew Internet and American Life Project.

The nonprofit group based its report on a survey of 809 self-identified artists in December 2003. The survey has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.

2JSC
12-06-2004, 10:12 AM
I feel the same way. I have downloaded hundreds of thousands of MP3's off of P2P networks and still find myself going out an buying the CDs that I listen to the most on my PC, just to have the case and any other goodies that might be on the disc, which are becoming more of a trend to get a video or something extra on a cd.

The latest CD's that I have bought are:

BT: Emotional Technology <- Just Awsome CD!
Quarashi: Jynx
Flogging Molly: Drunken Lullabies <- Awsome band!
Story of the Year: Page Avenue <- Killer guys!
The Darkness: Permission to Land <- Big hair 80's Style! :thumb

wazman
12-06-2004, 11:30 AM
I figured that... It's only the money hungry ones that have the trouble - like I've been saying for years, the average musician/band just wants to get their music out to as many people as possible. They don't care how.

CyberGuy
12-06-2004, 02:19 PM
I figured that... It's only the money hungry ones that have the trouble - like I've been saying for years, the average musician/band just wants to get their music out to as many people as possible. They don't care how.
You are absolutely right Waz. What better way to advertise your stuff? People download it, like the tunes and want more from you. If you release only a few tunes to the net, you will find that people will buy your CD just to see what else you have.

I would even venture to think people would buy MP3 music if they felt the product (music) is worth a couple of bucks. Software distributed as shareware is based on this and flourishing! People do not mind paying for good products.

getit29
12-06-2004, 03:52 PM
Its not just about the artists loosing a few dollars, it is all about the big recording labels
wanting more and more of your dollars in their pockets. The big labels could care less
weither or not the artists make or loose a few dollars just as long as the bigwigs get
their fat share of the $$$$$. :Nope

raven27
12-08-2004, 10:04 PM
The artists have to know the business.Without the knowledge and of not knowing the business part of it the artist will be out of luck.The manager can take up to 20% of what the artist makes and going on tour is a big payday for the manager and label.